From the Supreme Court
We, therefore, request the Chief Justice of the Madras high court to constitute a special bench ‘Green bench’ to deal with this case and other environmental matters. We make it clear that it would be open to the Bench to pass any appropriate order/orders keeping in view the directions issued by us. We may mention that ‘Green Benches’ are already functioning in Calcutta, Madhya Pradesh and some other HCs.
The suggestion for establishment of environment courts is a commendable one. Experience shows that the prosecutions launched in ordinary criminal courts under the provisions of the Water Act, Air Act and Environment Act never reach their conclusion either because of the workload in those courts or because there is no proper appreciation of the significance of the environment matters on the part of those in charge of conducting those cases. Moreover, any orders passed by the authorities under Water and Air Acts and the Environment Act are immediately questioned by the industries in courts. Those proceedings take years and years to reach a conclusion. Very often, interim orders are granted which effectively disable the authorities from ensuring the implementation of their orders. All this points to the need for creating environment courts which alone should be empowered to deal with all matters, civil and criminal, relating to environment. These courts should be manned by legally trained persons/judicial officers and should be allowed to adopt summary procedures
—INDIAN COUNCIL FOR ENVIRO-LEGAL ACTION VS UNION OF INDIA, 1996MUMBAI ORDERS
MANGROVES CASE
In a judgment delivered on October 6, 2007 the Bench of Chief Justice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice Dr D Y Chandrachud left no one in doubt when it said: “There shall be a total freeze on the destruction and cutting of mangroves in the entire state of Maharashtra.’’ The order banned the dumping of debris in mangrove areas (a common underhand way to reclaim land) and forbade “any authority’’ from granting permission for development activity in them. It also banned construction within 50 metres of mangroves.
The Bombay high court in March this year dismissed petitions filed by builders challenging the state government’s decision to notify land, including that near the Borivli National Park, on which their housing township projects were coming up as reserved forest area. After the state revenue department notified the land as forest land, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) had issued stop work notices to the developers whose construction projects were coming up on the said land.
The Supreme Court on in March 2006 held that the sale of surplus lands by National Textile Corporation was legal.
A bench comprising Justice S B Sinha and Justice P P Naolekar set aside a Bombay high court judgment, which had held that the sale of surplus lands of NTC mills was contrary to the BIFR (Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction) scheme and apex court order.
The SC said that the changes made in the rules for the development of the mill lands were constitutionally valid. It said the developmental plans, estimated at around Rs 5,000 crore (Rs 50 billion), were in conformity with the BIFR scheme.