|
Licence raj could kill microcredit….Gurcharan Das
Although human life is less than the blink of an eyelid in terms of the universe, it is staggering what it is able to create. Thirty million (yes, three crore!) poor women in Indian villages have taken small loans and started enterprises. With the loan they buy a cow to sell milk, or invest in a sewing machine to sell clothes or open a small kirana shop. What began as charity work by NGOs has become self-sustaining business, thanks to the entry of professional microfinance companies (MFIs) who are gradually replacing the village moneylender. In many districts, microcredit is as common as a cell phone or a paanwalla. It has given dignity to women, many of whom display the same intelligence and drive as our best entrepreneurs in Bangalore. It is financial inclusion at its best.
Success, however, creates envy as the Pandavas discovered in the Mahabharata. The problem began in October when politicians in Andhra Pradesh accused microfinance companies of loan sharking and causing suicides. They called for interest rate controls and told women to stop repaying loans. The police began to imprison MFI employees. The state issued an ordinance that requires MFIs to obtain government permission for each loan, which means that 1.3 crore tiny loans in Andhra villages will require prior approval. It is an impossible task, reminiscent of the dreaded licence raj, and a clear invitation to bribery. Meanwhile, a credit culture of weekly repayments built over a decade is destroyed. Banks, fearing default, have stopped lending to MFIs and this miraculous business is about to close, thus killing the hopes of three crore micro entrepreneurs.
Microfinance companies charge 24% to 32% interest, which appears high until you realize that we too pay 30% on our credit cards and village money lenders charge 65% to 100%. Even the Nobel Prize winning Muhammad Yunus` Grameen Bank charges 20% interest (based on subsidized credit). The truth is that it is expensive to deliver and collect loans weekly in rural areas. Customers do not think it high because they earn far more from the businesses they start with their loans. Success invites rogues and some loan sharks have disguised themselves as MFIs (with names like `Vessel under the Borewell`). They are giving the industry a bad name by using strong-arm collection tactics. Suicides are, of course, a terrible tragedy. But it is extremely unlikely that suicides could have been caused suddenly by professional MFIs who have built customer trust over a decade. If rogue MFIs are responsible, they should be punished. Why kill the ethical ones through licence raj?
Officials want to shut this business because it threatens the government`s microfinance company, which gives subsidized loans at only 3%. But women prefer private MFI loans because they say you need to bribe to get a government loan. And when you add the cost of multiple trips to the city and the bribe, the government loan ends up costing over 40%. The private MFI delivers the loan to the doorstep every seven days. Although officials claim that women are being duped, we all know that a poor person is far more aware of every paisa she earns and spends. Politicians had so far ignored MFIs, but the successful public stock offering (IPO) of one of the microfinance companies woke them up. If MFIs were making good money, why couldn`t they have a slice? They colluded with officials to announce a harsh ordinance that has brought the entire microlending industry to its knees. Since it is a matter of survival, they are waiting for MFIs to come running to them with bribes.
Microfinance should be regulated, but in an intelligent manner. MFIs should be transparent and be obliged to disclose interest rates. Competition should be encouraged 擁t will lead to lower rates. Rogue MFIs should be caught and punished. Imposing caps and harsh interest rates controls will destroy the industry as it did in Tunisia and Columbia. Countries that tried to control loan rates have invariably killed their microfinance business because industry margins are thin. Our regulators should learn from countries like Peru, which has imposed capital buffers, and this has led to a stable environment.
This astonishing story reminds us that the poor do not need charity but opportunity. Just when microfinance`s success is inspiring other businessmen to seek a `fortune at the bottom of the pyramid`, such as Tata`s Nano, its death would be a tragic loss. Crores of women would be thrown into the moneylender`s clutches. Andhra`s image will also take a beating. Until recently, Andhra was hailed for pioneering this industry. An international official was heard to say recently, “Corrupt officials and politicians of Andhra are about to kill the chances of the poor.” The new chief minister of Andhra Pradesh, Kiran Kumar Reddy, should now step in and not allow this to happen.
The writer is on the board of the not-for-profit NGO, SKS Microfinance
|