Access to improved drinking water sources in the country has increased, but what about water quality?
At the other end of the list is Manipur, which reported at 52.2 per cent, the lowest percentage of access to improved sources; here 27 per cent of urban households had piped water, while another 24 per cent used a public tap/standpipe. The issue of “safety” of water is, of course, not addressed by data on the source of drinking water, and problems abound in water quality, with contamination and high concentrations of nitrates, fluoride, arsenic and salinity. For example, 15 out of Bihar’s 38 districts have been found to have high arsenic levels, with significant health impact already documented. The focus has to be on improving access to piped water, as well as addressing problems in existing water supply networks.
SIP SOURCEs | |||
Share of households having access to |
Urban | Rural | Total |
Improved sources of drinking water |
95 | 84.5 | 87.6 |
Piped water into dwelling/yard/plot |
50.7 | 11.8 | 23.5 |
Public tap/stand place | 20.3 | 16.1 | 15.3 |
Tube well/bore hole | 21.3 | 53.2 | 45.8 |
Other improved sources | 2.7 | 3.4 | 3 |
Non-improved sources of drinking water |
4.8 | 15.4 | 12.2 |
Source: National Family Health Survey-3, 2005-06 |
DRINK DRIVE Percentage of households with access to improved sources of drinking water |
|||
Top five states | Bottom five states | ||
Punjab | 99.5 | Manipur | 52.1 |
Bihar | 96.1 | Jharkhand | 57.0 |
Haryana | 95.6 | Nagaland | 62.8 |
Andhra Pradesh | 94.0 | Meghalaya | 63.1 |
Uttar Pradesh | 93.7 | Kerala | 69.1 |
Source: National Family Health Survey-3, 2005-06 |