Groundwater Remediation Steps
(http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/resources/environment-book/groundwaterremediation.html)
1. Discovery and Source Determination
What do we know about
the source and the contaminant?
- What contaminant(s) are leaking into the aquifer?
- Many different types of chemical compounds are
released from landfills, industrial activity, end even and gasoline
tanks. You may thing gasoline is relatively simple, but in addition to
many volatile organic (carbon-based) compounds, gasoline also has toxic
anti-knock compounds such as tetraethyl lead (up until 1986) and methyl
tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE). - How long has the source leaked contaminants?
- What is the spatial extent of the source?
- Is it contained to a relatively small area such as a
leaking gasoline tank? - Is it spread over many acres, such as a leaking
landfill? - Is it spread over many square kilometers such as a
military installation or large mine? - What are the physical properties of the contaminant?
- Density (is it heavier or lighter than water)?
- Viscosity?
- What are the chemical properties of the contaminant?
- Does it dissolve in water?
- How does it react with oxygen, rock, or sediments in
the aquifer? - What is their concentration at various locations of an
extended source? Large industrial sites may have multiple leaking
underground tanks and disposal areas scattered over many square
kilometers. - Toxicology.
- What is the effect of the toxic contaminant on plants,
animals, humans or an ecosystem? - Is the toxiticity high enough to kill people or
wildlife?Density effects how contaminants move through an aquifer. Light
Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids such as gasoline float on water. LNAPL such as gasoline
Dense Non-Aqueous Phase
Liquids DNAPL such as dry-cleaning solvents sink in water.
2. Removal of the Source
Once a source has been
found, the most important first step toward remediation is to remove the source
if feasible. Removal often involves excavation of leaky tanks and contaminated
soil. Once the source is removed, the next step is to clean up contaminated
water still in the ground.
Employees of Cortland Pump and Equipment Company and Sherman Vincent Associates
General Contractors remove the concrete above the gasoline storage tanks at a
gas station in Jacksonville, FL.
3. Site Characterization
What do we know about
the geologic and hydraulic properties of the aquifer into which the
contaminants leaked?
- What is the extent of the aquifer? How deep? How wide?
Location of aquatards? - What are the physical properties of the aquifer?
- Pore size?
- Sediment or rock type?
- Hydraulic diffusivity?
- How fast does the water flow through the aquifer?
- What are the chemical properties of the rock and sediment
within the aquifer? - How pure is the aquifer upstream of the source of
contamination? This helps separate what is introduced by the source from
what is otherwise occuring in the aquifer. - What gases are disolved in the aquifer. For example,
how much oxygen is in the water?
4. Impact Evaluation
- What has happened to the the contaminant within the
aquifer? - How far has has the contaminant spread?
- Has the chemical composition changed due to natural
remediation? - Answers to these questions comes mostly from a
multiple well drilled into the aquifer. - The monitoring wells give the extent of the plume of
contaminants and the rate at which they move through the aquifer. Wells
are expensive to drill and operate, so much care must go into selecting
sites for wells. And, because few wells can be drilled, our ability to
visualize the subsurface is less than perfect. We are “looking”
through pinholes.Here is information from the Norman, Oklahoma landfill that is leaking
Biogeochemical
contaminants into an aquifer that runs under the site. It illustrates how
one site was evaluated. The remediation efforts are described by the US
Geological Survey’s Report on
and Geohydrologic Processes in a Landfill-Impacted Alluvial Aquifer,
Norman, Oklahoma.
Left: Drilling monitoring wells at Norman, Oklahoma landfill site. Right:
Location of monitoring wells at Norman, Oklahoma landfill. The location of
the landfill is shown in red and orange.
Click on images for a zoom.
Concentration of non-volatile dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the plume of
contaminated water from the Norman, Oklahoma landfill as measured by monitoring
wells. Well numbers are at top of graph.
5. Modeling
It is not possible to
completely monitor conditions within the plume and to predict future changes.
Models are used to help interpolate conditions between monitoring wells, and to
predict possible changes in the future. Additional wells and monitoring will be
needed to test the predictions.
6. Remediation
This involves removing
or containing the plume of contaminants within an aquifer. Many methods have
been devised and used to treat the many types of contaminants in the many types
of aquifers. Eight of the more common remediation methods are discussed below.
Remediation Methods
The method for
remediation depends on the several factors:
- Hydrogeologic setting
- Contaminant characteristics
- Physical properties (sink or float)
- Chemical properties (solubility, sorption)
- Subsurface access, land use
- Toxicity-risk
- Cost. All are expensive, and some are much more
expensive than others.