Public Private Partnership for Total Adoption of Government Schools
1.0 Background (add background info from the green book to build the perspective of the current scenario) add in SSA information from narang�s sheet
This document tries to seize the opportunity provided by the government�s initiative of allowing private partnerships with the objective of complete school adoption in government run primary, middle and high schools.
Significantly, from 1999 to 2006, the number of students in MCGM schools has declined from 636448 to 474037 (over 25%).
2.0 Information Regarding Government Schools
Source: Department of Education, MCGM (2006)
3.0 Defining Public and Private entities
For the purposes of this document � Public refers to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) schools, the teachers and the administrators; and Private refers to companies, organizations and individuals operating in the education arena of the not for profit sector.
4.0 Selection of School
It is necessary for the private entity to adopt a school building (including the school complex) � not an individual school.
If that school is already partly adopted, those people will be asked to shift to another school or be integrated into the existing project if the school committee and other party so wishes.
4.1 Accountability through the School Committee 4.1.1 Composition The school committee should comprise 5 members � the school head, a school teacher, two representatives from the private sector and a parent.
4.1.2 Quorum The school committee should follow a quorum of 3, with at least one representative from the private sector present. The committee must meet at least once a month.
4.1.3 Roles and Responsibilities The School Committee should: � Draw up and finalize an activity and a financial annual plan (including a budget) for the school. The annual financial plan will be sent to the education department for release of MCGM funds. The activity plan will be sent to the MCGM for information purposes only. � Conduct a baseline study on the criteria in 4.4 below using an independent authority. � Post all rules and systems in the HM�s office. � Meet every month to assess progress against the annual plan. � Have a system of incentives and rewards for all teaching and non-teaching staff. � Take action against any party not delivering on the above by writing to the steering committee. � Ensure independent assessments of students are done every year. � Take action against teachers violating the �no hitting/humiliation� and �tuitions� clause by referring these teachers to the steering committee. � Ensure the same team of leadership and teachers stays at the school and is not transferred out for the duration of the five years. � Ensure the same corporate and NGO can continue to adopt the school for an additional five-year term if progress is made in the school. � Ensure that government budgeted resources reach the school and is well-used. � Have the authority to give permission for all school programs, events and activities. � Conduct an school audit every six months, to determine how the school stands against the model school criteria in 4.4 below. This should be verified every year by an independent authority.
In the event that a NGO or corporate adopt multiple schools in the same building, the HM�s should coordinate scheduling of activities and physical infrastructure should be shared.
5.0 Implementation
5.1 Structure A not for profit, funded by an established corporate would adopt an existing school with the students, administrators and teachers. The school would be advised on all aspects of functioning and growth by a school committee with representatives from the government, the corporate and the NGO. The existing teachers and the administrators will continue to be paid by the government, while the NGO staff will be paid through the funding corporate.
5.2 Functioning
Add in quality of each of these
5.3 Metrics that Define Success – �Model School�
An MCGM �Model School� must achieve the following targets:
� 80% student attendance � Under 5% dropout � Academic Achievement as per goals set by the concerned school committee � Academic performance of the students in the state prescribed examination � Participation in extra-curricular activities � 70% attendance in parents meetings � One teacher per 20 students (including volunteers) � Every class should have a teacher physically in each classroom � No student hit/abused/humiliated � Every student has at least 4 special events/field-trips per year, including cultural activities and an annual day � Above-average Teacher performance as per performance appraisals as per the norms laid down by the school committee
Schools that achieve this should be highly recognized by the MCGM, the NGO and the Corporate.
6.0 Prohibitive measures Both for MCGM and NGO
7.0 Recommendations
1. It is recommended that this new policy be started from next academic year (2007-8) as a pilot program in a few schools.
2. The partnership should be given for a minimum period of five years.
3. In terms of funding this is a partnership between the government and the corporate. It is important the government budgeted money reaches the school and that the corporate is not funding the project independently.
4. It is recommended that both the corporate and NGO be selected carefully against a set of norms laid out by the steering committee. It is important to remember that every corporate will not add value, and every NGO does not have the capacity to effectively add value to a school. These norms, for the private sector, should include:
a. direct experience in the field of education for a minimum of 5 years b. 3 years audited annual accounts c. a detailed proposal including what the private sector wants to achieve in the school d. agreement to participate in an intensive workshop before starting (Should we include non political and secular??)
5. It is recommended that we work towards covering all MCGM schools, but start in a thoughtful, in-depth, phased manner (about 10 schools at a time), learning what it takes to truly transform a school and then feeding these best practices back in to a successful model. 6. Importantly, as all of the above are dependent on the steering committee, we recommend that the composition of the steering committee be 3 corporate leaders engaged in education reform and 3 NGO leaders who have had direct experience within the school system.
About School Social Work : School Social Work aims at improving the quality of life and education for children. School Social Workers help STUDENTS: 1. Achieve maximum benefit from their educational opportunities 2. Understand themselves and others 3. Improve interpersonal relationships 4. Cope with stress 5. Develop decision making skills School Social Workers help PARENTS : 1. Participate effectively in their children�s education. 2. Understand and meet their children�s socioemotional needs. 3. Understand programmes available to students with special needs 4. Use school and community resources effectively. School Social Workers help SCHOOLS: 1. Understand factors (cultural, societal, economic, familial and health) that affect students� abilities to make maximum use of their school experience 2. Utilize their resources in meeting the educational, social and emotional needs of students 3. Promote a safe and conducive school environment School Social Workers help COMMUNITIES: 1. Understand school policies, programmes, and practices 2. Minimize those environmental factors which inhibit learning 3. Develop resources to meet the needs of students and families.
Reforming The Existing Public School System In Mumbai- A Joint Effort Via Public Private Partnership
Defining Areas of intervention & Roles of All involved Partners
Some Suggestions – For the School Adoption Project to be truly effective all the school in a selected building should benefit from the project. Many of the cluster schools are one of many in a building.
– The role and decision making powers of the school committee needs to be carefully defined
– There is more to the Mid Day Meal than supplying it. The quality of what is served, how it is served and how the remains are disposed off all need a lot of attention.
— Current MCGM efforts are administratively time consuming and have negligible impact, therefore if health is to be a mandatory component of the school, the program should be revamped
From- Door Step School, Mumbai |